No one who has seen something of the Great Wall
of China can deny that this wonder of ancient military fortification
is a fantastic relic from the past that also bears witness to
human endeavour. The Wall attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors
each year from all parts of the world. The Great Wall is probably
the most widely recognised and enduring symbol of China and it
has been rightly said, "The man who doesn't visit the Wall
has never been to China."
In its entirety, the Great Wall, or to give it
its Chinese name Wan Li Chang Cheng, stretches over 10,000 li
or 5,000 kilometres. Following a forty-five day long survey of
101 sections of the Wall in different provinces, the China Great
Wall Academy reported on December 12, 2002 that this distance
is now merely an historic record. The forces of nature and destruction
at the hand of mankind are bringing about the gradual reduction
of its extent with the result that less than 30% remains in good
condition. The Academy has called for greater protection of this
important relic.
Fight against natural calamity
On our visit to Yulin, we found that the desertification
of the area is very serious. Although the government has had a
forestation programme in place over the past two decades, sands
drifting in the winds from Mao Wu Su Desert to the north continue
to wreak havoc, especially in springtime. Much of the ruined Wall
has been buried by sand and the only clue to its whereabouts is
the scattered beacon towers. Photographs taken of the recent excavations
of the Western Gate of Chang Le Bu indicate clearly how this once
grand fortress had been completely lost under the sand.
While the effects of nature are gradual and may
take effect over a quite lengthy period, the deliberate destruction
by man could totally deplete the Wall in a very short space of
time.
Should the new be built from the old?
The Yulin stretch of Wall lies along the route
of the Yulin-Shenmu Road. Local people have described how much
of the Wall here was destroyed when the road was constructed.
We came across a number of beacon towers as we travelled along
this road and their position confirms that the highway has been
constructed on the line of the grand old fortification. Recent
reports show that this is not an isolated case. In Ningxia, Shanxi,
and Gansu Provinces as well as in Inner Mongolia thousands of
miles of the tamped earth wall have been quarried. The rich soil
from the ramparts has been used as fertilizer, while in some areas
bricks have been taken for road construction as well as reservoir
and house building. Some parts have been dynamited and the stone
sold off. This means that traces of the wall are hard to find
in some areas.
This begs the question "Is it right that the new should be
built from the old?"
In a small village near Chang Le Bu we came across
a peasant who was busily building a stockyard of bricks taken
from the Wall. Nearby, it was plain to see tracks where material
had been hacked from the surface of the Wall. Although there are
regulations forbidding the construction of new buildings within
150 metres of the Wall, it appears that this official announcement
has failed to reach every corner of the city.
Rebuild or destroy it?
The Report cites two examples of improper Wall
"restorations".
On
its arrival in Dong Jia Kou, a small village in Funning County,
Hebei Province, the research group found a section of the wall
was being restored. It had been whitewashed and the whole section
appeared like a lime wall. This kind of restoration is more akin
to defacing rather than protecting. In another location, the Report
states that "new" sections have been built on the original
site of the Wall. This had been done with bricks and stone, whereas
the according to historical record the original Wall was of tamped
earth. It is as a consequence of this kind of thing that it becomes
difficult for archaeologists to trace the actual ruins.
Swarms of tourists from all over the world have
come to see this ancient Chinese wonder with the result that it
has become trendy to walk along the Wall. The current problem
is to strike a balance between the need to protect our cultural
heritage and the economic benefit it engenders through the tourism
it brings to the country. So many questions remain to be answered
with regard to preservation and the development of tourism. Clearly,
steps have to be taken to preserve the Wall in a manner that does
not detract from its cultural importance while keeping it in good
condition for the benefit of future generations.
|